Why writing less can create better content in the AI age
Note: This article was originally written several years ago. It has been updated to reflect how content writing has changed since the age of AI.
There’s a quiet pressure that follows anyone who writes for a living.
Not just to write well… but to write constantly.
Blogs. LinkedIn updates. Email newsletters. Thought leadership papers. Social posts. It’s just content-on-content to prove you’re still visible.
For years, the advice has been broadly the same: keep your output high, stay consistent, publish more.
Right now, AI tools are allowing content to be produced faster than ever.
Entire editorial calendars can be filled in under an hour. Marketing teams can generate blogs, landing pages and social posts in mere minutes.
But despite this explosion in output, something interesting has finally become apparent. And that is that more content won’t necessarily mean better content.
The content volume problem
While publishing more should, in theory, increase visibility, many organisations are discovering the opposite effect.
Because when everyone can publish constantly, the internet gets saturated with an overwhelming volume of similar content. Articles repeating the same ideas. LinkedIn feeds become crowded with near-identical takes on the same topic. Blog posts that rehash familiar points in only a slightly different way.
Quantity increases, but the impact the content has often doesn’t.
This is one of the paradoxes of modern content marketing. The easier it becomes to produce content, the harder it becomes for any single piece to really stand out.
Why content teams feel pressure to publish constantly
Most marketing teams are operating under a mix of expectations, which include:
SEO strategies built around publishing frequency
Social media algorithms that reward activity
Internal stakeholders asking for “more content”
AI tools that make content production appear quick and inexpensive
And when content becomes easier to produce, the instinct is often to produce more of it. Sometimes that works, and that’s great, but more often, it leads to a subtle shift in focus:
Writing something worth reading → publishing something new.
Writing less can sometimes mean writing better
This is where my own slightly unfashionable position comes in.
I’m not a prolific writer, and I never have been.
That’s not because I dislike writing, or because I struggle to generate ideas. It’s because I’ve always felt that writing benefits from space.
Space to think.
Space to notice something interesting.
Space to let ideas develop before turning them into sentences.
Some of the best pieces of writing, whether in journalism, marketing, or books, rarely feel rushed; they carry the sense that the author actually spent time considering what was worth saying, and how best to say it.
That kind of thinking doesn’t happen particularly well when you’re under constant publishing pressure.
AI hasn’t changed the fundamentals of good writing
The rise of AI has made this conversation even more interesting because AI can help with research, it can structure information quickly, and it can produce drafts at remarkable speed.
What it struggles to generate consistently is original perspective. Because true insight usually comes from:
Experiences
Observations
Curiosity
And simply paying attention to the patterns others have missed.
Those things are human-led and still take time, which means the most valuable writing today is often the writing that doesn’t try to compete on volume at all.
Instead, it’s competing on ‘thoughtfulness’.
Fewer pieces, more impact
Some of the most successful marketing content published today stems from organisations that focus on fewer, more considered pieces.
Articles that properly explore an idea
Guides that solve a real problem
Perspectives shaped by genuine experience.
In other words, content that people might actually choose to read.
This is something I explored further in another article about content volume vs content quality, where I looked at how publishing frequency can sometimes dilute impact rather than increase it.
A quieter approach to writing
There’s a certain comfort in believing that ‘visibility’ comes from constant content output. Publish more, appear more, stay top of mind?
The truth is that writing has never really worked like that. Most of the writing people remember tends to be writing that arrived with a clear point of view.
=====
FAQs
-
AI can help generate drafts, summarise information, and accelerate research. But thoughtful writing still relies on human insight, experience, and perspective; qualities that are much harder to automate.
-
AI has made it easier to produce content quickly, but that doesn’t mean businesses should publish more by default.
Many organisations are now focusing on fewer, higher-quality pieces that demonstrate expertise and offer real insight.
-
Publishing frequently can help search engines discover new content, but volume alone doesn’t guarantee better rankings.
High-quality content that answers real questions often performs better over time than a large volume of similar articles.
-
Both play a role, but quality tends to have the greater long-term impact. Well-researched, distinctive content is more likely to attract engagement, links, and sustained search visibility.
Now that you’ve read this, you may be interested in
